Total de visualizações de página

terça-feira, 23 de agosto de 2016

A LETTER TO THE FUTURE PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

[N.B. I personnally hope the President will not be him!!!]

http://imazon.org.br/imprensa/help-brazil-preserve-the-amazon/?lang=en

As reported in imazon.org.br

Help Brazil Preserve the Amazon


 

In the new issue of Americas Quarterly, we asked people, “What would you tell the next U.S. president about Latin America?” To see other authors’ responses, click here.

 

 

Dear Mister / Madam President,

Last June, Presidents Barack Obama and Dilma Rousseff, meeting in Washington, jointly declared that addressing climate change requires “continued, robust financial support.” They committed the U.S. and Brazil to an ambitious program aimed at helping developing countries mitigate the effects of climate change.

It was a landmark step. You should strengthen and expand this initiative — with special attention to the threats facing the Brazilian Amazon, where significant reductions in deforestation would produce enormous reductions in emissions. The work that still needs to be done is formidable.

Between 2004 and 2015, Brazil made great progress by reducing the deforestation rate of its Amazon region by more than 75 percent. But even with this large reduction, in the past three years, the region lost an average of 5,578 square kilometers (2,153 square miles) of forest annually, an area roughly the size of Delaware.

Zero deforestation should be the goal. But achieving it requires combining public policy initiatives with the positive influence of the market. For example, the U.S. and Brazil should deepen cooperation to enforce the Lacey Act against illegal logging. This would entail working together to improve the traceability of timber harvested in the Amazon and exported to the U.S. One way to do so is by exchanging data on logging permits. Additionally, the U.S. could help Brazilian and U.S. firms to fulfill their goals to curb deforestation by helping Brazil to implement full traceability of cattle in the Amazon region.

Brazil could benefit from the U.S. experience in managing national parklands to balance conservation and economic development. Although over 272 million acres of the Amazon have been allocated as conservation units (in the form of parks, national forests, etc.), the generation of jobs and income from these areas is currently only a fraction of its potential. Tourism and other activities in the U.S. national park system generated $32 billion and supported nearly 300,000 jobs in 2015. A Washington-sponsored initiative to develop collaboration between U.S. federal parks authorities and their Brazilian counterparts, including state and federal conservation authorities, would be a major step forward.

Investing in forest-based development would generate environmental and economic gains for both countries. We urge you to work with Brazil to develop the pledged Binational Program on Forest and Land Sector Investment and convene a public-private Forum on Innovative Forest Investment to increase investments in sustainable forest management and forest restoration in the region.

In their June 2015 declaration, the U.S. and Brazil also pledged to explore joint projects on clean energy. Studies show that several large hydropower plants proposed for the Amazon by the Brazilian government are very likely to increase deforestation as well as conflicts with indigenous peoples. U.S. collaboration would enable Brazil to develop other clean energy sources such as solar, biomass and wind, without increasing emissions — and avoid social conflicts associated with hydropower plants.

Further destruction of the Amazon would accelerate climate change, extinguish thousands of unique animal and plant species, and bring suffering to its indigenous peoples. Conserving it is in the U.S. interest as well as Brazil’s.

-

Veríssimo is a senior researcher and cofounder of the Amazon Institute of People and Environment (Imazon), a think-and-do-tank based in the Brazilian Amazon. He holds a master’s degree in ecology from Pennsylvania State University (USA) and a graduate degree in agriculture engineering from the Federal Rural University of the Brazilian Amazon.

Barreto is a senior researcher at Imazon. He holds a master’s degree in forest science from Yale University and a bachelor’s degree in forestry from the Federal Rural University in Pará state, Brazil.

Any opinions expressed in this piece do not necessarily reflect those of Americas Quarterly or its publishers.


segunda-feira, 8 de agosto de 2016

SUSTAINABILITY: EARTH OVERSHOOT DAY 2016

By Balakrishna Pisupati (UNEP Division of Environmental Law and Conventions) and Mathis Wackernagel (Global Footprint Network) | 08 August 2016


Today, millions of people around the world will watch as Olympic swimmers and divers compete in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We believe this global event begs the question: What if countries were as competitive about fulfilling the pledges for a sustainable world they made last year in New York and Paris, as they have been in training athletes for the Olympic Games?

Today (August 8) is Earth Overshoot Day 2016. Humanity has used all the renewable natural resources that the planet can replenish for the whole year, according to international research institute, Global Footprint Network.

Its data shows that humanity demands 64% more from nature than planet Earth can renew. We make up for that gap by depleting our planet’s natural capital through overfishing, overharvesting forests and emitting more carbon into our atmosphere than can be absorbed.

The disastrous consequences include climate change, topsoil erosion and biodiversity loss. The longer we continue viewing natural resources as unlimited, the faster we are jeopardizing the very capacity of our planet to provide us with the renewable resources that we need to feed, clothe and shelter ourselves.

We can measure the scope of our ecological overshoot by comparing the Ecological Footprint (demand for resources) to biocapacity (nature’s ability to supply these resources). Human demands compete for biologically productive space. Therefore, we can add up these required spaces to support demand and compare them with the spaces actually available.

Already 85 percent of the global population live in countries whose natural ecosystems do not suffice to support their Ecological Footprint. And 71 percent live in countries whose ecological deficit is compounded by low-income, adding to the challenge of affording, through trade, those resources that their own ecosystems can’t provide.

One of the most significant demands of humanity on nature stems from our carbon emissions as a result of fossil fuel burning. The carbon Footprint now makes up 60% of humanity’s Ecological Footprint. Absorbing carbon emissions competes with other demands on nature, such as producing crops, supporting grazing animals for food, wool and leather, and providing timber.

Thankfully, this year is no business as usual. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted in New York last September, and the Paris Climate Agreement, signed last December, have given us the best reason for hope to date. If we are to adhere to the Paris climate goals adopted by nearly 200 countries, carbon emissions will need to gradually fall to zero by 2050. This calls for a new way of living on our planet. That path is already made possible with current technology. Economic analysis shows it is also financially advantageous with overall benefits exceeding costs, since it will stimulate emerging sectors like renewable energy, while reducing risks and costs associated with stranded assets.

The only resource we still need more of is political will. Currently, for instance, only 19 countries (mostly islands and low-lying countries) have ratified the Paris Climate Agreement, accounting for 0.18% of total greenhouse gas emissions.

Fortunately, some countries are taking action. For instance, Costa Rica generated 97 percent of its electricity from renewable sources during the first three months of 2016. Portugal, Germany and Britain also demonstrated groundbreaking levels of renewable energy capability this year, when 100% of their electricity demand was met by renewables for several minutes or, in the case of Portugal, for several days. In China, meanwhile, the government has outlined a plan to reduce its citizens’ meat consumption by 50%, which it calculates will lower the carbon dioxide equivalent emissions from China’s livestock industry by 1 billion tonnes by 2030.

Furthermore, let’s bear in mind that the future we want is not the responsibility of governments alone. Balancing how much renewable natural resources we use and how much is generated is paramount for mankind to thrive on our beautiful planet. Each of us has the opportunity to participate. Through the choices we make every day as consumers and as citizens, we are already actively contributing to the world that we will be leaving for future generations.

What if the expected 3+ billion Rio Olympics viewers were as committed to taking action towards a low-carbon economy as they are excited about watching athletes compete? That shift is our most important task at hand. Building a sustainable world will take nothing less than transforming our individual and collective mindsets and setting our imaginations free.

Balakrishna Pisaputi, Coordinator, Biodiversity MEAs and SDGs, UNEP Division of Environmental Law and Conventions

Mathis Wackernagel, co-founder and CEO, Global Footprint Network