Total de visualizações de página

sexta-feira, 29 de maio de 2015

ZERO DEFORESTATION IN THE AMAZON. IS IT POSSIBLE!?


The National Institute for Space Research  ('INPE - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais') reported on Thursday (28th) that, during the quarter of February, March and April this year, the forest cover change alerts from Amazon, including clear-cutting (total destruction) and degradation (partial destruction) totaled 550 km2. This number is 62.7 larger than the 338 km2 recorded in the same period last year.

Photo. 'The lack of water starts here'.  Allusion to the lack of rains in southeastern Brazil.

The INPE reported on Thursday (28th) that, during the quarter of February, March and April this year, the forest cover change alerts from Amazon, including clear-cutting (total destruction) and degradation (partial destruction) totaled 550 km2. This number is 62.7 km2 larger than the 338 km2 recorded in the same period last year.

Of the total identified by INPE  between February and April this year, an estimated 362 km² (65.8%) are areas of deforestation by clear-cutting and 180 km2 correspond to areas of forest degradation. Mato Grosso is the State that had the largest area of alerts – 264.4 of 550 km2.
The information is from 'Deter' - the real-time detection system.

According to the INPE, the 'Deter' serves to guide the supervision in the field and curb the illegal deforestation. The system is not used for the accurate measurement of area, as is done with moderate resolution satellite images and there's always a margin of false positives.
In addition, it takes into account the cloud cover, which can disrupt the satellite view of the territory.

[...]





quinta-feira, 28 de maio de 2015

CULLING FOR REDUCTION OF 'PEST ANIMALS' IS NOT ALWAYS FEASIBLE

Cullers beware - killing 'pest' animals can increase their abundance

Christopher Johnson

8th May 2015 - reproduced from:




A study of feral cats in Tasmania shows that culling them to reduce their impact on native wildlife had a paradoxical effect - their population went up! If you can't take 'pest' animals out faster than they can reproduce and move in from nearby areas, writes Christopher Johnson, you're better off not bothering at all.

[...]

What went wrong?

What seems to have happened in these cases is that young animals quickly moved in from surrounding areas to replace dominant adults removed in the cull. Most of these young animals would normally have died. The sudden increase in their survival allowed abundance to overshoot pre-cull levels.

[...]

The more general problem is that removing some animals from a population creates more space and food for those that are left, and can disrupt social controls on breeding. Survival, reproduction and immigration all increase as a result, and the population quickly rebounds.

For culling to produce a lasting reduction in abundance, it is essential not just to accomplish the relatively easy task of removing animals from a high-density population. We also need to be able to continue removing animals at rates that equal or exceed the capacity for increase of a population with improved survival and reproduction.

[...]


segunda-feira, 18 de maio de 2015

DEATH IN COLOMBIA LANDSLIDE: IT'S NOT THE FIRST AND REGRETTABLY IT WILL NOT BE THE LAST ONE!

Colombia landslide kills dozens

Reproduced from BBC News

At least 48 people have been killed in a landslide in Antioquia province in north-west Colombia, officials say. Bodies are still being recovered and the authorities expect the number of fatalities to rise. Heavy rains caused the river Liboriana, in the town of Salgar, to burst its banks, triggering the landslide. Much of the village of Santa Margarita, south-west of the provincial capital, Medellin, was swept away when the landslide hit early on Monday.

Other tragedies (see below):

Below, reproduced from AGU- Americam Geophysics Union:
Colombia is a country with a serious landslide problem.  The combination of mountainous terrain,  active tectonics, occasional earthquakes, deep weathering and intense rainfall means that the level of hazard is high.  Add to this a vulnerable population and rapid expansion of the infrastructure, and the results are inevitably that losses from landslides are high.  In recent years I seem to have blogged about landslide events in Colombia on numerous occasions (for example herehere and here), and there have been some spectacular events caught on video. (Colombia is situated northwest, on the map)


domingo, 10 de maio de 2015

THAT'S WHAT I HAVE BEEN SHOWING TO MY STUDENTS: ONE ROAD THROUGH THE FOREST IS THE BEGINNING OF HUGE DESTRUCTION


Last great regions of pristine wilderness from Asia to Amazon under threat from massive road-building projects, scientist warns

“The best analogy I can use is that deforestation acts like a cancer. When the first road is built into a forested or wilderness area, deforestation tends to spread contagiously along the road route,” Professor Laurance said.

[Above, as reported on The Independent, London]

The slides below 'give evidence' of the effects of roads opened through the Amazonian region, in Brazil.
100 thousand km  of illegal roads opened along the main road from Altamira to Rurópolis in Pará state,
allowing wide deforestation in the Amazonian region.




sábado, 9 de maio de 2015

IGNORING THE LESSONS OF THE DUSTBOWL!?!?!?

Future dustbowl? Fracking ravages Great Plains land and water

Tim Radford

4th May 2015

As reported on http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/2852559/future_dustbowl_fracking_ravages_great_plains_land_and_water.html

The fracking boom has caused massive vegetation loss over North America's rangelands, writes Tim Radford, as 3 million hectares have been occupied by oil and gas infrastructure and 34 billion cubic metres of water have been pumped from semi-arid ecosystems.


Oil wells and natural gas may have made some Americans rich, but they have greatly impoverished the ecology and productivity of the great plains of North America, according to new research.

Fossil fuel prospectors have sunk 50,000 new wells a year since 2000 in three Canadian provinces and 11 US states, and have damaged the foundation of all economic growth: net primary production - otherwise known as biomass, or vegetation.

Brady Allred, assistant professor of rangeland ecology at the University of Montana's College of Forestry and Conservation, and colleagues write in the journal Science that they combined years of high-resolution satellite data with information from industry and public records to track the impact of oil drilling on natural and crop growth.

They conclude that the vegetation lost or removed by the expansion of the oil and gas business between 2000 and 2012 added up to 10 million tonnes of dry vegetation, or 4.5 million tonnes of carbon that otherwise would have been removed from the atmosphere.

Lost fodder equivalent to 120 million bushels of wheat

Put another way, this loss amounted to the equivalent of fodder for five million cattle for one month from the rangelands, and 120 million bushels of wheat from the croplands. This wheat equivalent, they point out, adds up to the equivalent of 13% of the wheat exported by the US in 2013.

Net primary production - the biomass that plants make from photosynthesis every day, all over the world - is the basis of all wealth and food security. It underwrites all other human and animal activity.

Human wealth depends ultimately on what grows in the ground, or what can be dug from the ground, and most of the latter - such as coal, oil and peat- was once stuff that grew in the ground.

The same net primary production is the basis of what economists sometimes call ecosystem services on which all civilisation depends: the natural replenishment of the water supply, the pollination of crops, the provision of natural nitrogen fertilisers, and the renewal of natural habitat for wild things.

'Long-lasting and potentially permanent' impact

And what worries the conservation scientists is that this loss of net primary production is likely to be "long-lasting and potentially permanent, as recovery or reclamation of previously drilled land has not kept pace with accelerated drilling."

"This is not surprising because current reclamation practices vary by land ownership and governing body, target only limited portions of the energy landscape, require substantial funding and implementation commitments, and are often not initiated until the end life of a well."

They say that the land actually taken up by wells, roads and storage facilities just between 2000 and 2012 is about 3 million hectares. This is the land area equivalent to three Yellowstone National Parks.

The hydraulic fracturing, or 'fracking', used to extract oil and gas is between 8,000 cubic metres and 50,000 cubic metres per well, which means that the total quantity of water squirted into the ground at high pressure during the 12 years to 2012 could exceed 33,900 million cubic metres - almost 34 cubic kilometres of water. At least half of this was used in areas already defined as 'water-stressed'.

Ignoring the lessons of the dustbowl

The researchers considered the drilling of new wells in Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan in Canada, and in Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Wyoming in the US.

Although there is legislation, it is limited to lands subject to federal jurisdiction, and 90% of all drilling infrastructure is now on privately-owned land - at least, in the US.

The study's authors want decision-makers to confront the challenges of this kind of ecological disruption. There are lessons from history in all this, they warn.

"In the early 20th century, rapid agricultural expansion and widespread displacement of native vegetation reduced the resilience of the region to drought, ultimately contributing to the Dust Bowl of the 1930s", they write.

"It took catastrophic disruption of livelihoods and economies to trigger policy reforms that addressed environmental and social risks of land-use change."