Total de visualizações de página

sábado, 30 de junho de 2012

DEAD ZONE: THE SOURCE OF THE GULF OF MEXICO HYPOXIA





A satellite image of the Gulf of Mexico and coastline.


Every summer for the past several decades, a large dead zone has threatened the economic and ecological health of the Gulf of Mexico, the nation’s largest and most productive fishery.

This dead zone occurs because of excessive nutrients entering the rivers, lakes, and estuaries that feed into or make up the Gulf of Mexico. Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential nutrients for plant growth, but too much of them can stimulate algal growth. And as algae die, they sink to the bottom of the water and decompose, all the while robbing the water body of the oxygen needed for aquatic life to thrive.

The result? Oxygen levels can drop too low to support most life in bottom and near bottom waters, creating a hypoxic or dead zone.

The size of each year’s hypoxic zone is primarily determined by the amount of nutrients flowing from the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin into the northern Gulf of Mexico – particularly the nutrient flow during April and May. Agricultural inputs are the largest source of these nutrients, though inputs from atmospheric deposition, urban areas, and wastewater treatment plants also contribute.

Complete information in:

http://www.usgs.gov/blogs/features/usgs_top_story/dead-zone-the-source-of-the-gulf-of-mexicos-hypoxia/?from=textlink


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

AN INTRODUCTION TO EVOLUTION

The definition
evolution, simply put, is descent with modification. This definition encompasses small-scale evolution (changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next) and large-scale evolution (the descent of different species from a common ancestor over many generations). Evolution helps us to understand the history of life.

The explanation
Biological evolution is not simply a matter of change over time. Lots of things change over time: trees lose their leaves, mountain ranges rise and erode, but they aren't examples of biological evolution because they don't involve descent through genetic inheritance.

The central idea of biological evolution is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor, just as you and your cousins share a common grandmother.

Through the process of descent with modification, the common ancestor of life on Earth gave rise to the fantastic diversity that we see documented in the fossil record and around us today. Evolution means that we're all distant cousins: humans and oak trees, hummingbirds and whales.




Leaves on trees change color and fall over several weeks.


Mountain ranges erode over millions of years.



A genealogy illustrates change with inheritance over a small number of years.



Over a large number of years, evolution produces tremendous diversity in forms of life.

See complete information in: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/evo_02

domingo, 24 de junho de 2012

THE RIO+20 WE DO NOT WANT

[Reproduced from SOS MATA ATLÂNTICA: www.sosma.org.br, 21st June 2012]

The Future We Want is not to be found in the document that bears this name. The Future We Want is not what resulted from the Rio +20 negotiation process.

The future that we want has commitment and action, not just promises. It has the urgency needed to reverse the social, environmental and economic crisis, not postpone it. It has cooperation and is in tune with civil society and its aspirations, and not just the comfortable position of governments.

None of these can be found in the 283 paragraphs of the official document that will be the legacy of this Conference. The document entitled The Future We Want is weak and falls far short of the spirit and the advances made over the years since Rio-92. It even falls far short of the importance and urgency of the issues addressed. Fragile and generic agendas for future negotiations do not guarantee results.

Rio +20 will go into History as the UN conference that offered global society a outcome marked by serious omissions. It endangers the preservation and social and environmental resilience of the planet, as well as any guarantee of acquired human rights for present and future generations.

For all these reasons, we, as many civil society groups and individuals, register our profound disappointment with the heads of State, under whose guidance and orders the negotiators worked, and we state that we do not condone or endorse this document.


Who signed the letter

Aiton Krenak
Ashok Khosla
Bill McKibben
Brittany Trifold
Camilla Toulmin
Carlos Alberto Ricardo
Carlos Eduardo Young
Christina Robertson
Davi Kopenawa Yanomami
Ester Agbarakwe
Fabio Feldmann
Hamouda Soubhi
Ignacy Sachs
Jim Leape
José Eli da Veiga
José Goldemberg
Juan Carlos Jintiach
Kelly Rigg
Kumi Naidoo
Luis Flores
Manuel Rodrigues Becerra
Marcelo Furtado
Marina Silva
Marina Silva
Marvin Nala
Mathis Wackernagel
Megaron Txucarramãe
Michel Lambert
Mohamned El-Ashry
Nay Htun
Nitin Desai
Oded Grajew
Peter May
Pierre Calame
Raoni Metuktire
Ricardo Abramovay
Ricardo Young
Roberto Klabin
Rubens Born
Sara Svensson
Sharan Burrow
Sergio Mindlin
Severn Suzuki
Thomas Lovejoy
Vandana Shiva
Wael Hmaidan
William Rees
Yolanda Kakabadse

Tags

Rio +20



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Postado por ecologiaemfoco às 11:11 AM 0 comentários

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

sábado, 23 de junho de 2012

Rio+20 closed with "more of a whimper than a roar"

[Reproduced From WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE]




["more of a whimper than a roar" = mais um gemido do que um rugido] The UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) comes to a close today. In total, more than 100 heads of state and tens of thousands of representatives from government, business, and civil society came together over two weeks to advance solutions on sustainable development in Rio de Janeiro.

“Rio+20 closed with more of a whimper than a roar. Expectations for the conference were understandably low, but the outcomes were even more modest. The agreed upon text was simply not forceful enough to meet the environment and development challenges of our times. This was a missed opportunity to re-energize the global conversation and importantly drive greater action around sustainability.

“There were a few bright spots— the advancement of Sustainable Development Goals, support for better governance around environmental issues, and progress on sustainable transport, among others. But, still, that is not enough.

“Certainly, there are reasons why the conference fell short: economic and political crises on the global stage; the challenge of taking on complex issues; and the struggle of coming to a unanimous decision among the diverse views. These challenges are real, but they should not be an excuse for inaction.

“So then, what comes next?

“We cannot lose sight of the big picture. It would be a mistake to conflate the outcome here with what’s happening on the ground around the world. Real action is taking place on national and local levels in many countries. Just look at Germany’s shift to clean energy, Niger’s efforts to re-green its landscape, or Rio’s just launched bus rapid transit system.

“We understand the challenges. We know the solutions. What we need is to build the political will for bolder leadership.

“As we leave Rio and return to our homes around the globe, we must not give up on the vision of a more sustainable pathway. Given the urgency of the challenges, we must continue to push forward with ambitious solutions that will create a more sustainable future.”






- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

sexta-feira, 22 de junho de 2012

RIO SUMMIT: LITTLE PROGRESS, 20 YEARS ON

[From BBC, 22 June 2012]




Twenty years after the first Rio summit, campaigners say this global gathering has failed to achieve similar results.

On the final day of the UN sustainable development summit in Rio, UN chief Ban Ki-moon has urged governments to eliminate hunger from the world.
The secretary-general said in a world of plenty, no-one should go hungry.

The final phase of the summit has seen pledges from countries and companies on issues such as clean energy.

But a number of veteran politicians have joined environment groups in saying the summit declaration was "a failure of leadership".

And UK Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg described the outcome as "insipid".

The meeting, marking 20 years since the iconic Earth Summit in the same city and 40 since the very first global environment gathering in Stockholm, was aimed at stimulating moves towards the "green economy".

But the declaration that was concluded by government negotiators on Tuesday and that ministers have not sought to re-open, puts the green economy as just one possible pathway to sustainable development.

Despite the fact that the world produces enough food to feed everyone, there are more hungry people today than when the world last met in Rio in 1992”

The former Brazilian President Fernando Cardoso, who chaired the 1992 Earth Summit, said the declaration did not do as much for environmental protection as for human development.

"This old division between environment and development is not the way we are going to solve the problems that we are creating for our grandchildren and great-grandchildren," he said.

"We have to accept that the solutions to poverty and inequality lie in sustainable growth, not growth at all costs."

'Ray of hope'

In the meeting's final phase, he [Ban Ki-Moon] challenged governments to do more.

The summit was supposed to ensure access to water, food and energy for the world's poor. "In a world of plenty, no-one, not a single person, should go hungry," he said.

"I invite all of you to join me in working for a future without hunger," he told the estimated 130 heads of state and government in Rio.

Currently, it is estimated that almost one billion people - one seventh of the world's population - live in chronic hunger, while another billion do not receive adequate nutrition.

Measures that could help address this include eliminating food waste - about one-third of food is thrown away in rich countries and an even higher proportion in the poorest, for different reasons - and doubling the productivity of smallholdings.

The challenge is partly based on Brazil's own "hunger zero" programme, started by President Lula de Silva.


There is no new money, and no changes to the way the UN organisation itself approaches the issue of hunger.

Outside the main negotiations in Rio, companies and governments have made well over 200 pledges of voluntary action in various areas.

Energy, water and food are all in that mix - though outnumbered by pledges to include sustainability issues in education programmes.



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

quinta-feira, 14 de junho de 2012

[Reproduced from NATURE | NEWS, 13 June 2012;
Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10822]

'Hippie chimp' genome sequenced
Genetic sequence could solve mystery of why bonobos are more peaceful than other




When the Congo River in central Africa formed, a group of apes was forever stranded on its southern banks. Two million years later, the descendants of these apes — the bonobos — have developed distinct social patterns. Unlike their chimpanzee relatives on the northern shore, they shun violent male dominance and instead forge bonds through food-sharing, play and casual sex.


Unlike common chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, bonobos, Pan paniscus, seem to use sex to resolve disputes.

An 18-year-old female named Ulindi has now become the first bonobo, Pan paniscus, to have its genome sequenced. Scientists hope that the information gleaned will explain the stark behavioural differences between bonobos and common chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, and help to identify the genetic changes that set humans apart from other apes.


Distant relatives
Humans, chimps and bonobos all share a common ancestor that lived about 6 million years ago in Africa, when the human lineage splintered off. By the time that our Homo erectus ancestors were roaming the African savannah 2 million to 1.5 million years ago, populations of the common ancestor of chimpanzees and bonobos had been separated by the Congo River.

The main result, published in, NATURE (2012) doi:10.1038/nature11128, was:

On average, the two alleles in single-copy, autosomal regions in the Ulindi genome are approximately 99.9% identical to each other, 99.6% identical to corresponding sequences in the chimpanzee genome and 98.7% identical to corresponding sequences in the human genome.

Little and probably no interbreeding has occurred since then, says Kay Prüfer, a bioinformatician at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who led the sequencing study. Comparisons of the bonobo genome and sequences of chimps from various populations showed that chimps living just across the Congo River were no more closely related to bonobos than were populations living as far away as Côte d’Ivoire. That implies that the separation was quick and permanent, says Prüfer.

Once the ancestors of bonobos had been separated from those of chimpanzees, they may have found themselves in a very different ecological world. North of the Congo River, the ranges of chimpanzees and gorillas overlap, so those animals compete for food. But no gorillas live south of the river, so bonobos face much less food competition, says Victoria Wobber, a comparative psychologist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who has worked with bonobos including Ulindi.


In the absence of competition, the ancestors of bonobos may have been free to forage a wider range of foods in large groups, and share the spoils freely. “When food is more consistently available, a lot of the aggression you see in chimps, you don’t need anymore,” says Wobber.

Bonobos also treat sex as casually as a handshake, earning them the nickname ‘hippie chimps’. The sex is often non-procreative and can occur between pairs of the same sex. Chimps tend to have sex only when females are in estrous. “Instead of resolving their disputes aggressively, maybe they’re resolving them with sex,” says Wobber. And whereas chimpanzee groups are dominated by hyper-aggressive males, bonobo groups are less hierarchical and are often headed by females.

Genetic discrepancies between chimps and bonobos must be involved in these behavioural differences, says Prüfer. But identifying which genetic changes are involved and how they influence behaviour will take time.


However, the sequence of a single bonobo is not enough, says Varki. Other bonobos may share different genomic regions with humans, and these genes would be missed by relying on a single bonobo sequence. Varki says that researchers are planning to sequence the genomes of dozens more bonobos, chimps and gorillas to fill the gaps.

And Ulindi may not be representative of most bonobos in behaviour, either. Wobber has noticed vast behavioural differences in her work with bonobos, and says that the genomic model of the hippie chimp isn’t a peacenik. Ulindi sometimes lashed out at Wobber. “She’s just a mean bonobo. That’s my own personal experience with her,” says Wobber. “I might have picked a different one to sample.”



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Location:OUR CLOSEST COUSIN: BONOBO, THE 'HIPPIE CHIMP'

sábado, 9 de junho de 2012

TESCO SUPPLIER (UK) ACCUSED OF CONTRIBUTING TO AMAZON RAINFOREST DESTRUCTION

[Reproduced from http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian]




Cattle at an illegal settlement in northern Brazil: such ranches are the leading source of rainforest destruction in the Amazon.


British consumers are unwittingly contributing to the devastation of the Amazon rainforest by buying meat products from Tesco, according to Greenpeace.

The environmental group says in a report that canned beef from the supermarket chain has been found to contain meat from ranches that have been carved out of the lands of indigenous peoples, and farms the Brazilian government believes have been sited in illegally deforested lands.

The allegations stem from an 18-month investigation carried out by Greenpeace into the practices of JBS, a big Brazilian supplier of meat and cattle byproducts .The campaigning group claims it unearthed evidence of serious violations of thecompany's own ethical code, and those of companies it supplies, including Tesco.


British consumers are unwittingly contributing to the devastation of the Amazon rainforest by buying meat products from Tesco, according to Greenpeace.

The environmental group says in a report that canned beef from the supermarket chain has been found to contain meat from ranches that have been carved out of the lands of indigenous peoples, and farms the Brazilian government believes have been sited in illegally deforested lands.

The allegations stem from an 18-month investigation carried out by Greenpeace into the practices of JBS, a big Brazilian supplier of meat and cattle byproducts. The campaigning group claims it unearthed evidence of serious violations of the company's own ethical code, and those of companies it supplies, including Tesco.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

quinta-feira, 7 de junho de 2012

VARROA MITE SPREADS LETHAL HONEYBEE VIRUS


[By Victoria Gill, BBC Nature]




Some honeybee colonies in Hawaii are still free from the parasitic mite which
has helped a virus wipe out billions of honeybees throughout the globe, say scientists.

A team studying honeybees in Hawaii found that the Varroa mite helped spread a particularly nasty strain of a disease called deformed wing virus.

The mites act as tiny incubators of one deadly form of the disease, and inject it directly into the bees' blood.

This has led to "one of the most widely-distributed and contagious insect viruses on the planet".


The findings are reported in the journal Science.

The team, led by Dr Stephen Martin from the University of Sheffield, studied the honeybees in Hawaii, where Varroa was accidentally brought from California just five years ago.


Bees have different colour detection systems from humans, and can see the world in ultraviolet. This helps them to detect the flowers they pollinate and take nectar from
Pollination is essential for agriculture, as well as the reproduction of non-food flowers and plants. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, pollinators including bees, birds and bats are involved in more than a third of the world's crop production.

This provided the team with a unique natural laboratory; they could compare recently-infected colonies with those free from the parasite, and paint a biological picture of exactly how Varroa affected the bees.

The team spent two years monitoring colonies - screening Varroa-infected and uninfected bees to see what viruses lived in their bodies.

Dr Martin explained to BBC Nature that most viruses were not normally harmful to the bees, but the mite "selected" one lethal strain of one specific virus.

"In an infected bee there can be more viral particles than there are people on the planet," Dr Martin explained.

"There's a vast diversity of viral strains within a bee, and most of them are adapted to exist in their own little bit of the insect; they get on quite happily."

But the mite, he explained, "shifts something".

In Varroa-infected bees, over time, the vast majority of these innocuous virus strains disappear and the bees' bodies are filled with one lethal strain of deformed wing virus.

And when it comes to viral infection, it's the sheer quantity that kills; each viral particle invades a cell and takes over its internal machinery, turning the bee's own body against itself.

Although it is not clear exactly why this strain thrives in mite-infected bees, Dr Martin explained that it could be the one virus best able to survive being repeatedly transmitted from the mites to the bees and back, as the mites feed on the bees' blood.

The effect appears to take once the mites have changed this "viral landscape" in the bees' bodies, the change is permanent.

"So the only way to control the virus is to control the levels of the mite," said Dr Martin.

Prof Ian Jones, a virologist from the University of Reading said the findings mirrored "other known mechanisms of virus spread".

He added: "[This] reinforces the need for beekeepers to control Varroa infestation."




- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad